VIPS TYPES: PUS.PRIVS
A/PUS.VIPS
Even if public bodies are not “clients” in the private sector sense, I can only offer RLA to cocoo, if i become sole practitioner i could approach pus and pris orgs to offer RLA. but, as inhouse, cocoo may only submit NRLA.USPs to PUS…not rlas. nrlas require NO PRIOR ENGAGEMENT…. but i do need to offer KA that is uniquely suited to solve a Problem recognised in the PPP pipelines, which needs solving and only us can offer the right solution, thus, theres no need to tender…instead, i can propose a JV (joint.venture) between cocoo and PUS. we offer unique value or solutions not readily available in the market and aligns with the public sector’s objectives of value for money and social value…..the Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012 requires public authorities to consider the economic, social, and environmental well-being of their area when procuring services. This means that proposals demonstrating significant social value could be more attractive to public sector bodies
B/PRIS.VIPS
(individuals or companies). COCOO HAS OBLIGATION TO PRIOR ENGAGEMENT
offering COCOO’s membership, mediation, or opinion services to PRIS, are likely to be considered unethical >> AVOID sra issues, BY USE OF
-In England and Wales, mediation services are not classified as “reserved legal activities” under the Legal Services Act 2007. Consequently, organizations like COCOO Ltd. can offer mediation services to parties involved in ongoing arbitration and court cases without the need for registration with a professional body. Also, COCOO Ltd. can provide neutral legal opinions to parties without requiring specific authorization or registration. However, it’s essential to ensure that these services do not encroach upon reserved activities, such as conducting litigation or exercising rights of audience. also, make sure there is no direct solicitation …becos i am the inhousSol, and would be seen as unethical by sra) >> to PRIS companies, I can instead of offering mediation.opinion.strat services, i should offer it indirectly, via legal.strategic training offers. direct solicitation is however, allowed to PUS organisations (as they r not regarded as ‘clients’), so cocoo may directly offer them mediation.opinion.strat services, and membership
is direct solicitation of membership to companies involved in litigation, or to offer the cocoo’s membership to victims , considered unethical by the SRA ?. or only the direct solicitation of mediation or opinion or strategic services, is regarded by SRA as unethical? What is the cocoo’s marketing team does the drafting and sending of the cocoo’s services ?
COCOO Ltd. can: 1. Offer mediation services to parties in ongoing arbitration and court cases without mandatory registration with a professional body. 2.Provide non-reserved legal neutral opinions to parties, ensuring that these services remain within the scope of nrlas.
*USP2pris: cocoo’s USP as agent, to provide NRLA, including mediation services, and representation to parties in ongoing arbitration cases, or court cases, or in eu’s odr….. to companies that are victims of other companies or cmas.decis etc….providing legal advice is not classified as a reserved legal activity. This means that entities like Cocoo Ltd., even if not structured as a traditional law firm or solicitor organization, can offer legal advice without breaching regulatory constraints. Therefore, Cocoo Ltd. can represent companies that are victims of competition law violations, acting as an agent, as long as such representation is limited to non-reserved legal activities, such as providing legal advice. However, it’s crucial to ensure that the representation does not extend into reserved activities, such as conducting litigation