www.eur-lex

JOIN US FREE         LIVE PROJECTS                                              ABOUT US   MEDIATION   ADVOCACY   DONATE  PRIVACY POLICY T&C

---

The COCOO-EUR-Lex Doctrine: A Strategic Model for Legislative and Precedent Warfare

This doctrine establishes the protocol for interrogating EUR-Lex (eur-lex.europa.eu), the official gateway to all European Union law. This is not a library; it is the source code of the EU’s regulatory and legal power. We will weaponize this platform to dissect legislation, hunt for binding legal precedent, understand the political intent behind the law, and build the unshakeable legal foundations for our most critical strategic plays, including Challenge Discretion, APPEALS (JR2COURT), and the USP-to-WTO pipeline.

1. Core Principles of Interrogation

Our use of EUR-Lex is governed by the most fundamental principles of the COCOO framework. We are not just reading the law; we are deconstructing it to find the routes to victory.

• Legislative Autopsy: We will never take a law at face value. Our doctrine demands a full “legislative autopsy” for any critical regulation. By using EUR-Lex to trace a law from its initial Preparatory documents to the final Legal act, we uncover the political compromises, discarded drafts, and original intent, which are invaluable for challenging its interpretation in court.
• Precedent as a Weapon (APPEALS JR2COURT): The mind maps mandate that we use appeals to the highest courts as a core offensive strategy.¹ EUR-Lex is our primary armoury for this, providing direct access to the entire body of case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). We will build a library of judgments that define the limits of regulatory power, which will arm every submission we make.
• The WPI Definition Engine: The concept of “Public Interest” (WPI) is a key battleground.¹ Its meaning is defined and shaped by EU treaties, regulations, and court judgments. We will use EUR-Lex to master the EU’s definition of WPI, allowing us to frame our arguments in the language of the institutions and deconstruct the self-serving narratives of our opponents.
• The USP-to-WTO Foundation: Every EU regulation that acts as a non-tariff trade barrier (a Product Standard, PS) is published here.¹ We will use EUR-Lex to find the precise legal text of these standards. This text is the incontrovertible evidence of the barrier’s existence, forming the core of our USP to harmed non-EU nations and their companies (e.g., US producers like Monsanto).¹

2. Weaponizing the Platform’s Arsenal: Capabilities and Search Rules

Mastery of EUR-Lex’s powerful search capabilities is paramount. Its structured nature allows for surgical intelligence gathering that is impossible with standard search engines.

• Official Search Rules & Functionality: Based on the platform’s design and our intelligence, here are the key search rules we will exploit ²:

Operator/Syntax	Function	Example of COCOO Use
AND	Finds documents containing all search terms.	"public procurement" AND directive
OR	Finds documents containing either or both search terms.	merger OR acquisition
NOT	Excludes documents containing a specific term.	"state aid" NOT agriculture
" "	Searches for the exact phrase.	"abuse of a dominant position"
*	Wildcard for multiple characters.	compet* (finds competition, competitive, etc.)
?	Wildcard for a single character.	mobili?e (finds mobilise and mobilize)

• Key Platform Features & Filters:
  • Collections: The ability to limit a search to a specific document Collection is our primary tool for focused research. Key collections include Legal acts, Case-law, and Preparatory documents.²
  • Author: We can filter by the specific EU institution that produced the document, such as the European Commission or the Court of Justice.²
  • Date: We can filter by various date types (Date of document, Date of publication, etc.) and specify exact dates or ranges.²
  • EuroVoc Thesaurus: This is a superior alternative to simple keyword searching. It allows us to search by structured, official EU topics like competition law, public contract, or trade barrier, ensuring comprehensive and accurate results across all EU languages.²
  • Document Type: We can filter by specific legal instruments, such as Regulation, Directive, or Decision.⁵
  • Procedure: We can track all documents related to a single legislative procedure, allowing us to see its entire history in one place.²

3. Strategic Interrogation: The Questions We Ask

We interrogate EUR-Lex to find the legal facts and precedents that will win our cases.

• For Challenge Discretion & APPEALS:

  • “What is the full legislative history of the Digital Markets Act? Search the Lawmaking procedures collection to find the initial Commission proposal and all subsequent amendments to understand the political intent behind key articles.”
  • “Find all judgments from the Court of Justice that interpret Article 102 TFEU (Dominant positions) in the context of the pharmaceuticals sector. What is the established case law on ‘excessive pricing’?”
  • “What are the exact legal grounds on which the Commission based its decision in the “ antitrust case? Search the Case-law collection for the case number and analyze the text of the decision.”

• For USP-to-WTO & Trade Barrier Analysis:

  • “What is the full legal text of the EU regulation imposing new ‘sustainability’ standards on imported textiles? Search the Legal acts collection for Regulation with keywords textiles AND sustainability after a specific date.”
  • “Find the EU’s ‘Trade Barrier Regulation’. Search the Consolidated texts collection to ensure we have the most up-to-date version to cite in our USP to a non-EU government.”

• For FOC DAM & State Aid:

  • “Find the Commission Decision that declared the state aid to the airline “ illegal. What were the specific legal grounds cited in the judgment that we can use to build a damages claim for a competitor like Ryanair?”

4. The COCOO-EUR-Lex Strategic Playbook: A Model for Action

The following playbooks provide standardized workflows for using EUR-Lex to generate decisive legal intelligence.

Playbook A: The “Legislative Autopsy” Protocol

• Objective: To deconstruct any EU law to find its strategic weaknesses and unstated political intent.
• Execution:
  1. Find the Law: Use the search to find the final Legal act (e.g., a specific Regulation or Directive).
  2. Find the Procedure: On the document’s page, navigate to the “Lawmaking procedure” tab. This is the central hub for the autopsy.
  3. Harvest Preparatory Acts: From the procedure page, download all key Preparatory documents: the initial European Commission proposal, the opinions of the Economic and Social Committee, and the reports from the European Parliament.
  4. Identify the Changes: Compare the text of the initial proposal with the final adopted text. What was removed? What was added? These changes reveal the political compromises and can expose ambiguities or weaknesses in the final text that can be exploited in litigation.
• Strategic Outcome: This playbook provides COCOO with a deep, nuanced understanding of a law that goes far beyond its surface text, providing unique angles to challenge its application or interpretation.

Playbook B: The “Precedent Hunter” (APPEALS Engine)

• Objective: To find the specific case law needed to attack a regulator’s decision or build an appeal.
• Execution:
  1. Go to Advanced Search: Select the Case-law collection.²
  2. Target the Court: Filter by Author: “Court of Justice of the European Union”.²
  3. Use EuroVoc for Precision: Use the Theme filter to select a precise legal topic from the EuroVoc thesaurus, such as “restrictive practice” or “dominant position”.² This is far more accurate than a simple keyword search.
  4. Add Contextual Keywords: In the text search box, add keywords for the specific industry or fact pattern (e.g., pharmaceuticals, rebates, refusal to supply).
  5. Analyze Judgments: Dissect the resulting judgments, looking for principles that have successfully overturned Commission or national regulator decisions.
• Strategic Outcome: This creates a targeted dossier of legal ammunition. When challenging a regulator, we can lead with, “As the Court of Justice held in Case C-XXX/XX…”, immediately grounding our argument in binding precedent.

Playbook C: The “Trade Barrier (PS) Identification” Engine

• Objective: To find the precise legal text of a non-tariff trade barrier to form the evidentiary core of a USP-to-WTO campaign.
• Execution:
  1. Identify the Suspected Barrier: From market intelligence, identify a new EU standard causing harm to a non-EU industry. Example: A new EU rule on the carbon footprint of imported steel.
  2. Isolate the Legal Act: Go to Advanced Search and select the Legal acts collection.² Filter Document type to “Regulation”.
  3. Search for Keywords: In the text search, use keywords relevant to the barrier.
     • Query: steel AND ("carbon footprint" OR CBAM OR "border adjustment")
  4. Filter by Date: Use the Date of document filter to narrow the search to acts published after the policy was announced.
  5. Retrieve the Text: Download the full PDF of the resulting regulation. The specific articles detailing the new requirements are the “smoking gun.”
• Strategic Outcome: This playbook provides the hard, indisputable legal evidence of a trade barrier’s existence. This evidence is the foundation of a USP to a harmed nation (e.g., approaching the government of Brazil or South Korea), transforming a general complaint into a specific, litigable issue.