cy press distributions

 

---

Cy Pres Distributions in Class Action Settlements

The cy pres doctrine (from the French phrase cy près comme possible, meaning “as near as possible”) is a legal principle used in U.S. class action settlements when it is impractical to directly distribute damages to all affected class members. This typically happens in situations where:

1. Class Members Cannot Be Identified or Located: For example, if the harm affects a diffuse group of individuals without clear records or contact information.
2. Low Individual Recovery Amounts: When individual payouts would be so small (e.g., a few cents per person) that distributing them directly is inefficient.
3. Unclaimed Funds Remain: After eligible class members have been compensated, leftover funds may still exist.

How Cy Pres Distributions Work

1. Selection of Beneficiaries:
   • Courts direct leftover settlement funds to organizations, initiatives, or charities that indirectly benefit the class or align with the goals of the litigation.
   • Examples include nonprofits, consumer advocacy groups, academic research initiatives, or public-interest programs relevant to the litigation’s subject.
2. Legal Oversight:
   • Courts approve cy pres beneficiaries to ensure they serve purposes closely related to the original claims in the case. For example:
     • A class action against a tech company for data breaches might direct funds to organizations focused on cybersecurity education.
     • A consumer fraud case might allocate funds to consumer rights organizations.
3. Common Examples of Cy Pres Recipients:
   • Educational institutions (e.g., scholarships for studies in law, technology, or ethics).
   • Advocacy groups promoting consumer protection, public safety, or environmental sustainability.
   • Charitable organizations that support victims of similar types of harm (e.g., privacy violations, discrimination, or financial fraud).

Legal Standards for Cy Pres Awards

Courts are careful to ensure that cy pres distributions meet certain criteria:

1. Nexus to the Case: The recipient must advance interests related to the class’s harm.
2. Avoidance of Conflicts: Judges and attorneys must not have personal or professional connections to the chosen organizations.
3. Feasibility: Cy pres awards are used only when direct distribution is infeasible.

Criticism of Cy Pres Doctrine

The doctrine has faced criticism, primarily for the following reasons:

1. Lack of Direct Benefit to Class Members: Critics argue that class members may receive no tangible compensation.
2. Potential for Misuse: There is concern that cy pres funds could be directed to organizations favored by attorneys or judges rather than genuinely benefiting the class.
3. Accountability Issues: Monitoring how funds are used by beneficiaries can be challenging.

Prominent Cy Pres Settlements

1. Google Privacy Class Action (2019): A $13 million settlement was distributed to privacy advocacy groups after individual payouts to affected users (estimated at pennies per person) were deemed impractical.
2. Facebook Beacon Settlement (2010): Unclaimed funds from a $9.5 million privacy lawsuit were allocated to a digital privacy foundation.

Benefits of Cy Pres Distributions

Despite criticisms, cy pres awards are a pragmatic solution in cases involving large, unidentifiable, or minimally harmed classes. They:

1. Ensure that settlement funds serve a purpose rather than being returned to defendants.
2. Support organizations or causes that align with the litigation’s goals.
3. Promote long-term benefits by funding research, education, or advocacy to prevent future harms.