LIVE PETITIONS:
!!!! WARNING !!!!! : como solicitor SOLO puedo asesorar jurídicamente en España sobre Derecho Internacional y Derecho inglés. NO PUEDO ASESORAR JURIDICAMENTE SOBRE DERECHO ESPANOL NI TAMPOCO ejercer ante los tribunales españoles, dirigir litigios ni redactar documentos de carácter judicial
uk.procurement: LEGAL PANEL FOR GOV: TENDER (TL: 1 APRIL) : (CCS) as the Authority intends to put in place a Framework Agreement for the provision of Legal Services to be utilised by central government departments including associated arm’s length bodies (ALBs). It is intended that this commercial agreement will be the recommended vehicle for all legal services required by central government departments and their ALBs. The Framework Agreement will have 7 Lots: Lot 1 – Core Legal Services Lot 2 – Major Projects and Complex Advice Lot 3 – Finance and High Risk / Innovation Lot 4a – Trade and Investment Negotiations Lot 4b – International Trade Disputes Lot 4c – International Investment Disputes Lot 5 – Rail Legal Services Value £820,000,000
radon minpresidencia 11 mar 25.docx 2ec complaint v esp radon.docx
radiation.EC.FOI.v.spain>>foc RADIATION.POST
all spains.ec.FOIs2018-2024>>foc esp.foi.infringements.ec>>foc
esp.VFM.reformas.necesarias.urgentes
nikki’s v valve.gdfolnikki’s CAT focol application v valve.pdfv.meta.gdfol
new.VIPS (identified now, thanks to a SAC’s new precedent) >> i must be searching daily for new clp precedents updates emails news >> look for sacs.focols.focsings, filed in a country >> look for victims in other jurisdictions >> file the same type of claim in there FOC/MASSARB before the cat.cjeu.natcourts
oecd.focs.how2claim.damages.uk.clp.courtsFOCsFOCS: TYPES AND CLASSACTIONS
RIEFA FOCOL V. APPLE. AMAZON.pdf >>
SENT
TBS
-FIND VICTIMS OF VALVE IN SPAIN AND OTHER NATIONS TO FOCOL, BASED ON THE SACdecision.valve.v.ec.2023 , BY SEEKING INSPIRATION IN THE UK’S FOCOL: FOCOL.NIKKI.cat.gdpdf AND the ZAIGER.lawfirm attempt to mass.arb was thwarded by Valve :EX.Valve Corporation v. Zaiger, LLC: In 2023, Valve sued a law firm, Zaiger, alleging that it attempted to extort settlements from Valve by threatening to bring numerous antitrust arbitration cases on behalf of Steam customers, a tactic referred to as “mass arbitration”. Valve also brought suit against a litigation financier for Zaiger over the funding of a social media campaign to recruit Steam users as clients. Valve alleged that they improperly interfered with its contracts with Steam customers and abused the arbitration process by signing up clients with the intent of obtaining settlements slightly lower than the cost of arbitration filing fees, rather than arbitrating their claims. Valve said that it was targeted due to the terms of the Steam Subscriber Agreement, in which Valve would be responsible for the fees and costs associated with arbitration. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice by the US District Court for the Western District of Washington in 2024 due to personal jurisdiction issues. In September 2024, Valve changed its Steam Subscriber Agreement to require disputes to proceed in court, with no option of arbitration
PENALTIES
PENALTY.VIPS: cma.ec decis to impose excessive penalties on companies >> cocoo v cma.ec, before the cat.cjeu.natcourts ex. Lobbying uk fines cases.pdf (autodownload). lobbying.uk.fines.cases.pdf.sfl
SENT
TBS
ADP.CARTEL
ADP.CARTEL.gdfolADP.CARTEL.POST
NORDSTREAM.adp: POST.kingprompted: nordSTREAM v euparl and eucouncil Nord Stream 2 AG v. European Union, PCA Case No. 2020-07 cocoo3PINT.NORDSTREAM.POST
SENT
–SUMITOMO/EEW.MA.obs.sent.2.ecPART2PART3PART4PART5POST. SUMITOMO.eew.proposed.MASUMITOMO.eew.my.observations.2.ec
–ip.ds OBS.2.EC >> ip.ds PART 2
– visa.mast.google.apple.GDFOL
–sabadell CNMC.SABADELL.MA (FASE 2)flawed.cnmc.2015.decis.not2review.visa.mastercard >> digit.pay.VISAMAST.ECA.report >> gpt >>post >> <> = global leader for data, news and insights on innovation in payments and the platforms powering the connected economy. PYMNTS is the source that decision-makers turn to when seeking a balanced, curated and informed point of view on the role of payments, connected devices and new tech in transforming how people and businesses pay, get paid and monetize their interactions- cocoo.sent.letters.v. APPLE.GOOGLE.MASTERCARD.VISA.gdfol
TBS
proposed.MAs >> BA >> block/clear
SENT
TBS
: GOOGLE.gdfol cocoo progoogle.adteck GCRCMA targets Google in first DMCC investigationJAN.25
SENT
gd. cocoo.PETITION.euparl. proGOOGLE.adtech >> POST.my.pro.google.DOJ.complaint` >>
TBS
POST.my.pro.google.cma.cnmc.ec.complaints <>
SA
SENT
–Bane Nor.SA.gd.pdf = BANE.NOR.post TL.3pint.obs = 5 JAN.25. registry@eftasurv.int myobs.2.ESA.v.banenor.pdf
–complaint.sent.2.ec.on.bulgaria.pdf
–INDONESIA’S OIL.sa. OBS.2.EC.pdfMYCOMPLAINT2EC.on.INDONESIA.SA C/2024/7405: Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the anti-subsidy measures applicable to imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia: gdpdf. complaint v indonesia.giving.SA.to.nationalchampPOST.indonesia.SA TRADE-R829-BIODIESEL-INJURY@ec.europa.eu TL:12.JAN.25 : this indonesian (subidised by indochina…)natchamp’s gws(oil) exports to EU, at subsidized prices >> recurrence of injury to the eu oil industry.. EU.LOGIN: Nightwish12@@10 contact@cocoo
TBS
-INDONESIA CASE: complaint2.wto. and 2.indonesia and2.cjeu
-BULGARIA CASE: Gta.state.act:bulgaria
eu.budget.eca.rlcm
SENT
– = COCOO.complaint2.EC. v spain.rrf.rlcm.gdpdfRRF.ECA.report.24.gdfol >> eca.REPORT.rrf >> ec.REPLY >> post >> i emailed complaint.request to EC asking to stop RRF funding to spain and clawback
–COCOO.sent.COMPLAINT V CMAec.response.2.myletter >> SENT.2.CMAMY.COMPLAINT.2.EC.gd
-my.cnmc.complaint.v.spain.rrf (use: this doc ) >> COCOO.denuncia.a.CNMC v spain.rrf.rlcm RRF.NEXTGEN.gdfol
TBS
AUSTRIA.VAT.DEROGATION:
–austria.vat.derog >> letter.2.austrian.cma EXPRESSING OUR CONCERNS ABOUT THE EC.GC.DECISION (include a copy of our letter to DGTAX) my.COMPLAINT.SENT.2.DG.tax(CJEU) v ec.gc decision austria.tax.privilege (vat derogation) >> cocoo: such privilege harms the p.equality and the common market: AUSTRIA.VAT.saCLECAT COMPLAINT.V.AUSTRIA.VAT.saaustrIa.sa.POST
ua.source/investment
uk.unlawful.middle.east.investms.docuk.unlawful.middle.east.investm.pdf
investment/UA.source.VIPS: are the investments or positive spills or competitive advantages or selective advantages, unlawful ? >> void contracts, divolve.mas, ETC . EXS:
LALIGA.CASE: A second complaint by La Liga against one of Europe’s wealthiest football clubs has emerged, this time targeting Manchester City over allegedly unlawful investments from the United Arab Emirates
https://cocoo.uk/cocoo-v-esp-moro-ec-itas/globalisation.wto.itas.pdf
EU.ITAS.PORTALeu.itas.by.nationeu.ita.enforcement.ADR <> EU.ita.adrs >> live.bilateral.ADRseu.live.ADRs. circabc=tbri (trade.barrier.investigs)eu.TBRseu.WTO.adrsLIVE.INVESTIGS.eu.TDI.(trade.defence.investigs)eu.industries.statisticseu.short.term.stats
eu.login.cocoo: Nightwish12@@12 contact@cocoo.uk >> EU.markets >> EU.access.market.db.users >> EU.mta: mytrade.assistantEU.mta.TOOLBOXEU.search.ITAs.with.non.eu.marketsEU.investm.DISPUTES.searchEU.tariffsrival.entry.COMPLAINT.2.Access2Markets.team
complaints.re.SEP (single entry point) : The SEP, Single Entry Point, is the first point of contact for all EU stakeholders who are facing potential trade barriers in third countries or who find non-compliance with sustainability rules related to Trade and Sustainable Development or the Generalised Scheme of Preferences. To help you find your way, the Single Entry Point has developed two complaint forms, one on market access/trade barriers and one on sustainability issues – as well as step-by-step guides to completing them. For matters relating to the Anti-Coercion Instrument and to submit relevant information please visit Anti-Coercion Instrument Single point of contact. The Single Entry Point can support you when you are preparing your complaint – you can contact the Single Entry Point directly on trade-single-entry-point@ec.europa.eu
REGULATION (EU) 2022/1031 : thirdcountryfirms can be excluded [=decision not to apply the ipi measure] from eu procurement/concessions, if wpi goals outweight the benefit competition [from allowing thirdcountryfirms to compete for eu tenders <> COCOO WILL CLAIM THAT THIRDCOUNTRYFIRMS SHOULD , OR SHOULD NOT, BE EXCLUDED FROM TENDERS…and all eu ITAs with morocoo….must be revoked (nulled)
gov has o.2public.consults (and to help themselves get more demolegit) >> cocoo will USP for :shadowing (via the oecd acn secretariat); inclusion in gov.delegations; sitting at mediation tables; advising gov on reg/leg. convince them that i can mobilise masses/coll.focs >> bigger whitemail power in usa, no locus is needed, for anyone to claim v a noncompliant plc/pus, when the authorities fail to do it <> uk jr case: mag v sosbis, for failing to refer to cma a proposed matoipo i will petition the appending of wpi clauses, to itas/wto/inv.agreems, by using the MAI (multilat.agreem on investms) cocoo will help implement CSR (corp social resp) and offer publicity of plcs good deepds (good reput) i will insist to worldbank…, that plcs requesting loans/debt.relief, must show proof , as condition, proof of involving local communities in their programs….not to pollut, and to compensate any victims… i will petition for gov. action , by using s.301 petition (usa) or the tbr (tb reg) in eu. i will complain (to wto…)…there are 2 dbs of such complaints: mad (eu) and nte (usa)
GLOBALISATION: 1 page summary + WTO litig/cases . clp <>IP . spills. finansialisation. cocoo to lobby (wto, spain, eu…), not sending money, but offering legal opinions, to show the merits of pot. cases (nation v nation)…as they have little litig resources and expertise….my advice will remind them of their o.2defend the wpi >> o2choose cases that challenge SYSTEMIC TBS (that afffect many plcs, gws, consumers…)
SENT
TBS
LA LIGA
; MORO : moroco.gdfol
; ICAS.WTO